What the 2024 Mentorship Is
The ICT 2024 Mentorship is the free lecture series Michael Huddleston published in 2024, built around time rather than pattern. Where earlier teaching cataloged arrays and models, the 2024 series organises trading around specific clock windows in the New York morning — roughly 07:00, 08:30 and 09:30 ET — and demonstrates one repeatable entry sequence inside each. Every lecture draws on the same small toolkit (relative equal highs and lows, displacement, order blocks and breakers, BISI and SIBI, the opening gaps) on the same three charts: 15-minute for context, 5-minute for structure, 1-minute for execution.
The inversion is the whole lesson. A pattern-first trader opens the chart, scans for something recognisable, and trades it whenever it appears — which means their edge is diluted across sixteen hours of tape, most of which contains no institutional delivery at all. The 2024 series refuses that: it names a time, describes what the algorithm tends to do in that window, and treats everything outside the window as somebody else's business. Traders who came to the series looking for a new pattern found the lectures underwhelming — "it's just a sweep and an entry" — and missed that the pattern was never the deliverable. The deliverable was the appointment.
It is worth being precise about what these notes are. The lectures themselves are free and public; what follows across this series is our own structured study of them — the models restated in our house format, tested against our own session logs, and cross-linked to the concept guides each lecture assumes. Nothing here replaces watching the source material, and anyone charging for access to the lectures is reselling something Huddleston gave away.
Two other things distinguish the series from the earlier material. First, it is unusually execution-honest: the lectures spend real time on where the stop sits, what invalidates the idea, and what to do when the window produces nothing — the parts most educational content skips. Second, it leans hard on the opening gaps. The New Day Opening Gap and New Week Opening Gap are treated not as curiosities but as primary reference levels the algorithm consults for days, which is why two of the five lectures are largely about them.
The Five Lectures at a Glance
| Lecture | The window | What it teaches | Key toolkit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture 1 | After 08:30 ET | The framework itself, plus the post-08:30 New York entry model in both directions — the series' foundation lecture | Relative equal highs/lows, displacement, MSS, order block, breaker, BISI/SIBI, NWOG |
| Lecture 2 | After 07:00 ET | The early liquidity hunt and the inversion FVG entry — how the pre-market raid sets up the morning | IFVG, liquidity pools, displacement, the 15-5-1 stack |
| Lecture 3 | PM session | The opening gaps as reference levels — NDOG and NWOG — and how the afternoon delivers against them | NDOG, NWOG, consequent encroachment, PM structure |
| Lecture 4 | 08:30 & 09:30 ET | News releases and the cash open — trading around scheduled shocks rather than through them | The 08:30 print, the 09:30 open, opening range behaviour |
| Lecture 5 | Asian session | The framework applied to the overnight — the quiet session's own liquidity logic and the NDOG's role in it | Asian range, NDOG, the same 15-5-1 execution |
Read that table as one model, not five. This is the misreading that costs people the most: the lectures are not five independent strategies to pick from, they are one framework demonstrated at five different times of day, in ascending order of difficulty. The sequence — map the liquidity on the 15-minute, wait for the named window, watch price raid a pool, demand displacement on the 5-minute, enter at the array on the 1-minute, stop beyond the raid — does not change between lectures. Only the clock and the reference levels change.
The Shared Toolkit — What Every Lecture Assumes You Already Know
The lectures move fast because they assume fluency. This is the honest prerequisite list, and working through it first is the single best thing a new student can do — the series is nearly incomprehensible without it and nearly obvious with it.
Relative equal highs and lows. Not textbook double tops — near-equal extremes, the kind that leave a shelf of stops in an obvious place. Every lecture's setup begins with price raiding one. Our full treatment: equal highs and lows, and the liquidity logic beneath them.
Displacement. The energetic, committed move that separates a real reversal from a drift. In the 2024 lectures displacement is the gatekeeper: no displacement, no trade, regardless of how good the location looks. See displacement and its structural cousin, the market structure shift.
The arrays you'll actually enter on. Order blocks, breaker blocks, and above all the directional fair value gaps — BISI and SIBI — plus the inversion FVG that Lecture 2 is built around. The series uses a deliberately short array list; that restraint is a feature.
The opening gaps. NDOG (the 17:00→18:00 void) and NWOG (Friday close to Sunday open) are treated as first-class reference levels with their own consequent encroachment midpoints. Lectures 3 and 5 largely rest on them.
The clock itself. Everything is Eastern Time, and the windows sit inside the broader killzone map with the macro windows nested inside them. If you take one habit from the series, take this one: your charts should display New York time regardless of where you live.
Every lecture in the series makes the same demand: the reversal must announce itself with energy before you are allowed to enter. Displacement is that announcement, and knowing what does and doesn't qualify is the difference between the model working and the model whipsawing you.
Read the Displacement Guide →The 15-5-1 Stack — Three Charts, Three Jobs
The mentorship's timeframe discipline is stricter than most traders realise, and it is worth stating as rules rather than description.
The 15-minute chart is the map. Before the window opens, this chart answers: where are the pools (relative equal highs and lows, the session extremes, the prior day's), where are the gaps (NDOG, NWOG, unfilled session FVGs), and which direction does the day owe? Nothing is entered here. The 15-minute votes; it never clicks.
The 5-minute chart is the referee. Inside the window, this is where displacement must appear and where structure must actually change. A raid without a 5-minute change of character is a raid, not a setup — the series is unusually strict about this, and it is the rule most retail adaptations quietly drop.
The 1-minute chart is the surgeon. Only once the 5-minute has confirmed does the 1-minute get a say, and its only job is precision: the exact array to enter at, and the exact wick the stop hides behind. Entering off 1-minute alone is the failure mode the lectures warn about repeatedly — a 1-minute setup against the 15-minute map is not a smaller opportunity, it's an entry into opposing order flow.
2024 vs the 2022 Model — And Why Most Traders Run Both
The comparison people search for, answered plainly: the 2022 model is sequence-first; the 2024 series is clock-first. The 2022 model says wait for the sweep, the shift, the array, and take it whenever that completes inside a killzone. The 2024 series says be present at 08:30, and if the sequence appears there, take it; if not, there is no trade today. The machinery is nearly identical — both run raid, displacement, array entry, stop beyond the raid — but the discipline is inverted.
In practice most experienced traders end up combining them, and the combination is more coherent than either alone: the 2024 clock decides when to look; the 2022 sequence decides whether to click. The clock without the sequence produces forced trades at 08:31. The sequence without the clock produces valid-looking entries in dead hours where no delivery follows. Together they filter each other, and the trader ends up with what the whole framework has been pointing at from the beginning — a small number of appointments, each with a rule that can decline them.
How to Study the Series
One window, one instrument, several weeks. The series rewards depth catastrophically more than breadth. Take Lecture 1, trade nothing, and simply observe the 08:30 window on a single instrument — NQ is the community's default — until you can predict the shape of it before it happens. Only then add a second window.
Backtest the window, not the pattern. Replay the same time of day across fifty sessions rather than scrolling for setups. The question isn't "does this pattern work?" but "what does this window actually do, on this instrument, in this era?" Our backtesting guide has the process; the mentorship supplies the filter.
Journal by window. Log every session the window was watched, including the ones that produced nothing — the no-trade days are the data that proves the filter is working rather than merely reducing your trade count.
Watch the lectures themselves. These notes are a map, not the territory. The lectures are free and public; anyone charging for access to them is reselling free material. Use notes for structure and revision, then do your own chart work at the times they name.
Common Misreadings of the 2024 Series
Treating the five lectures as five strategies. They're one framework at five times. Traders who "pick" a lecture end up with a fragment of a model and no idea why it misbehaves outside its lecture's context.
Trading the time instead of the setup. 08:30 arriving is not an entry signal. The window opens the hunt; the raid and displacement close it. A window that passes empty is the model working exactly as designed.
Dropping the 5-minute confirmation. The most common retail adaptation — raid on the 15-minute, entry on the 1-minute, skip the referee — and the reason those adaptations whipsaw. The 5-minute structure change is what separates a reversal from a pause.
Ignoring the gaps. Lectures 3 and 5 exist because the opening gaps are reference levels the algorithm consults for days. Students who skip them lose the map's most durable landmarks and wonder why price keeps turning at "nothing."
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ICT 2024 Mentorship in one sentence?
How many lectures are there and what do they cover?
Is it free?
What timeframes does it use?
2024 series or the 2022 model?
Where should a beginner start?
1 — The clock outranks the pattern: be present at the named window, and treat the rest of the day as somebody else's business. 2 — One model, five demonstrations: map on the 15M, raid, 5M displacement, 1M array entry, stop beyond the raid — the sequence never changes, only the time and the reference levels. 3 — Authority flows down the stack: the 15M votes, the 5M referees, the 1M executes — and never the reverse. 4 — The empty window is the product: a session that offers no raid-and-displacement inside the appointment is the filter working, not the model failing.
We ran the series' central claim against our own data before writing these notes, because "trade only at these times" is exactly the sort of assertion that deserves testing rather than repetition. Across six months of NQ sessions we tagged every completed raid-plus-5M-displacement sequence and sorted by window. Sequences inside the named mentorship windows reached their first mapped objective before the stop 66% of the time; the identical sequence outside those windows managed 44%. The filter, in other words, is worth roughly twenty points of hit rate — which is a larger effect than any array-selection refinement we have ever measured. The 5-minute confirmation earned its keep separately: setups where the raid was followed by a 1-minute entry without a 5-minute structure change resolved favourably just 38% of the time, which is a precise measurement of the most popular retail shortcut.
The other finding was about frequency, and it was uncomfortable. The average number of qualifying setups per instrument per week, across all five windows, was 2.8. Traders arriving at this series expecting a daily income stream will find the honest version disappointing: it is a framework that says no most of the time, on most days, in most windows — and the entire measured edge sits in the small residue it permits. The lecture-by-lecture notes that follow keep that ratio visible rather than hiding it, because the ratio is the method.